Later in the evening on May 10, it was communicated that India and Pakistan are entering a ceasefire agreement under the orchestration of US President Trump and his administration.
However, not everyone is in approval of this fair agreement, and the same can be understood from the latest tweet shared by Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi.
A short while back, Owaisi Twitter, a series of questions where he ridiculed PM Modi about the logical fallacy of the nature of the ceasefire agreement.
Before questions that were raised by the Hyderabad MP are as below:
I wish our PM @narendramodi had announced the ceasefire rather than the President of a foreign country. We have always been opposed to third party intervention since Simla (1972). Why have we now accepted it? I hope the Kashmir issue will not be internationalised, as it is our internal matter.
Why are we agreeing to talk on a neutral territory? What will be the agenda of these talks? Does the United States guarantee that Pakistan will not use its territory for terrorism?
Have we achieved our aim of deterring Pakistan from carrying out future terror attacks? Was our goal to get a Trump-brokered ceasefire or was it to bring Pakistan to such a position that it would not even dream of another terror attack?
We must continue the international campaign to put Pakistan in the FATF grey list.
The evident argument from Owaisi here is that he wants India to take a strong stand against Pakistan and ground rules. He also wants India to see if the United States will guarantee that Pakistan will not use its territory for terrorism.
Related